Probe urged into JUI MNA's marriage with underage girl

Probe urged into JUI MNA’s marriage with ‘underage’ girl

CHITRAL: A local organisation has requested the Chitral police to conduct an inquiry into marriage of an underage girl of grade 9 with an MNA from Balochistan.

In an application, Anjuman Dawat-o-Azeemat has contended that the news of the underage girl’s marriage with an elderly person had gone viral on social media, angering people.

The police have been requested to conduct inquiry into whether the girl had attained the marriageable age, and if not, take action against all those responsible under the Prevention of Child Marriage Act.

The social media is brimming with comments on the marriage of 14-year-old girl with a man about four times of her age. Involvement of a local JUI-F leader in the marriage is also alleged. 

When contacted, Chitral police station SHO Inspector Sajjad Ahmed confirmed receiving the application from the organisation and said a proper inquiry would be started as the girl’s father was not present in Chitral.

He said the girl was a student of Government Girls High School, Jughoor, where her date of birth had been recorded as Oct 28, 2006, which showed that she had not attained the age of marriage.

He said a few days ago on the complaint of the organisation, the police had reached the girl’s home, but her father had denied the girl’s marriage and had even given an affidavit to this affect.

The bridegroom, Maulana Salahuddin Ayubi, had won NA-263 Qilla Abdullah seat in the 2018 general elections on the MMA ticket. 

Published in Dawn, February 18th, 2021

One Reply to “Probe urged into JUI MNA’s marriage with ‘underage’ girl”

  1. Usually age in the school certificate is underwritten in Chitral (standards of musalmani). Even if correct she was over14 years which is marriageable age according to Islamic traditions. What is important is to know if the girls consent had been taken in the marriage. Secondly if adequate haq Mehr etc has been ensured. The most important thing is why was this marriage held secretly, despite meeting ‘sharee’ requirements. Why not openly and solemnly, like a marriage should be? There is where doubts and suspicions arise.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.