noor shahidin and jamil bhai… as a chitrali I’m proud of both of you for realizing this issue and making fruitful comments. there is no way that one person can challenge us and try to rule on us. what a nonsense is this in 21st century. God Almighty bless both of u and keep it up. thanks.
jamil says
I am fully agree with Noorshaheedin about fair and impartial inquiry in this matter. Peshawar high court should immediately appoint an impartial judge to enquire the case indepently and fairly. It is very sad that nowadays government employees are not solving their pity issues through their line departments and are bringing them to the public. Judicial and prosecution are basically very closely and interdependent departments and their basic responsibities are to provide justices to the people. If they start fighting each other in the streets and take the laws in their own hands then what one can expect from ignorant uneducated masses. Anyhow impartial inquiry must be done immediately and the culprits must be punished according to the law of the land.
*noorshahidin USA* says
What is the role of a judge?
A judge has many roles. Judges interpret the law, assess the evidence in a presented case, control how hearings and trials may unfold in their courtrooms, BUT most important of all of his duties are that a judge MUST remain impartial decision-makers in the pursuit of justice.
That last part of the previous sentence is of crucial and vital importance. They must remain impartial decision-makers in the pursuit of justice. I’m presenting this textbook definition of what a judge is supposed to be because this has been ignored for the past three days. This current situation and how it’s transpired is of absolute disgust from both parties and both are at fault to certain extents. But the more abhorring matter is what follows the initial incident. This is something that could have easily been resolved within both communities without the involvement of any press, but the “employees” felt compelled to release a press statement in which, without mercy, they presented a very one-sided, biased, and unfair character assassination of Muhammad Afzal. In no way or form did this press release provide any fair assessment of the situation, but instead, in a sad and desperate attempt to sway the public opinion, this press release from the Judge’s office has slandered a respected member of a society, who comes from a respected family of the society, who even turned himself into the authorities after the initial scuffle. The fact that these “employees” of the Judge’s department felt compelled to release these slanderous statements about another government employee is of repugnance and it goes against the very definition of his job title. He MUST remain an impartial decision-maker in the pursuit of justice. By attempting to sway public opinion to his personal favor, this petty attempt shows a reflection of his inability to be impartial, fair, or just.
noor shahidin and jamil bhai… as a chitrali I’m proud of both of you for realizing this issue and making fruitful comments. there is no way that one person can challenge us and try to rule on us. what a nonsense is this in 21st century. God Almighty bless both of u and keep it up. thanks.
I am fully agree with Noorshaheedin about fair and impartial inquiry in this matter. Peshawar high court should immediately appoint an impartial judge to enquire the case indepently and fairly. It is very sad that nowadays government employees are not solving their pity issues through their line departments and are bringing them to the public. Judicial and prosecution are basically very closely and interdependent departments and their basic responsibities are to provide justices to the people. If they start fighting each other in the streets and take the laws in their own hands then what one can expect from ignorant uneducated masses. Anyhow impartial inquiry must be done immediately and the culprits must be punished according to the law of the land.
What is the role of a judge?
A judge has many roles. Judges interpret the law, assess the evidence in a presented case, control how hearings and trials may unfold in their courtrooms, BUT most important of all of his duties are that a judge MUST remain impartial decision-makers in the pursuit of justice.
That last part of the previous sentence is of crucial and vital importance. They must remain impartial decision-makers in the pursuit of justice. I’m presenting this textbook definition of what a judge is supposed to be because this has been ignored for the past three days. This current situation and how it’s transpired is of absolute disgust from both parties and both are at fault to certain extents. But the more abhorring matter is what follows the initial incident. This is something that could have easily been resolved within both communities without the involvement of any press, but the “employees” felt compelled to release a press statement in which, without mercy, they presented a very one-sided, biased, and unfair character assassination of Muhammad Afzal. In no way or form did this press release provide any fair assessment of the situation, but instead, in a sad and desperate attempt to sway the public opinion, this press release from the Judge’s office has slandered a respected member of a society, who comes from a respected family of the society, who even turned himself into the authorities after the initial scuffle. The fact that these “employees” of the Judge’s department felt compelled to release these slanderous statements about another government employee is of repugnance and it goes against the very definition of his job title. He MUST remain an impartial decision-maker in the pursuit of justice. By attempting to sway public opinion to his personal favor, this petty attempt shows a reflection of his inability to be impartial, fair, or just.